Saturday, May 5, 2018

How Does What You Are Doing Differ From False Witness? We Should Make This A Formal Forensic Process

More than a few of you, dear readers, friends, correspondents, well wishers and others, inform me that after more than a year and a half of asking and waiting, my former district president has not yet corrected the public record and his public announcements that I have been removed from membership as a pastor in the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. So it has been safe to assume, for some time now, that this is no longer a mistake, but a deliberate effort to avoid telling the truth. The letter below seeks to correct the public record in a more formal process.

So feel free to share the information below and any of the documents given in the sources section with anyone you think can help make this happen. And please do continue to contact me with whatever ideas you may have, and if you find any other memos, announcements, letters, etc., that might shed some light on why such a simple task remains undone. I would also be interested in other pastors and church workers in our synod who have received similar treatment. I must reluctantly conclude that the behavior described here will continue until enough of us demand that it not be tolerated. Let's see what we can do about that.

As always, I'm glad to hear from those of you who have an interest. Please use the comment section of this blog, or use the contact information on lcms.org under the "locator" section, for church workers.


Dear President Hardy,

You have used our synod, our district, our praesidium, and our publications and web sites to print, circulate, and publish things about me which are not true. You have had the documentation demonstrating that these things are not true since August of 2016. [01] After asking you repeatedly to retract, correct and expunge these things, you have left these untruths unretracted, unexpunged and uncorrected for over 18 months. These false assertions were easily correctable errors and avoidable mistakes which you could easily remedy. After asking and waiting for over a year and half for you to correct your demonstrably false statements about me, I must conclude that your failure to do so is intentional and malicious. You have used your position and your membership in our synod to sacrifice and damage someone else's reputation, ordination, vocation and ability to earn a living rather tell the truth and correct what you have done.

The next step should start with dispute resolution. Every day that you fail to correct what you have put in print is another day that you circulate falsehoods about me. If you are willing to do that for this length of time in my case, I must wonder how many others in your district and in our synod have been affected by your malicious refusal to correct your errors. So let's get started on the process quickly.

I find this particular path you have chosen to be very strange, sad and regrettable. This began with an easily avoidable, and easily correctable, mistake by your office. You had the dates of my clergy roster membership wrong by one year. [02] You compounded this error by fabricating other, equally false reasons for removing me from our clergy roster in July of 2016. [03] These reasons and claims used to justify your actions have been proven to be fabrications. The truth is simple: I was a member of synod from January of 2009 until January of 2017. I received, and accepted, a call as Chaplain to a Recognized Service Organization in the second week of July 2016, six months before January of 2017. A week later, on July 17, 2016, you removed me from the clergy roster. You claimed my membership in synod had expired January 31, 2016. That assertion is demonstrably false. Correspondence from your own office documented that I was a member of synod from January of 2009 to 2017.

In your letter of July 18, 2016, you claimed that you had not heard from me when you invited me to apply to continue my non-candidate status as a member of synod. That is an astonishing claim for you to make, and it is a deceit that covers a multitude of deceits. What you and your office heard from me repeatedly, by email and fedex from May to July of 2016, was exactly what happened: I accepted a call as a chaplain to a Recognized Service Organization, the Saint Timothy Society; I could apply for non-candidate status, but I did not know how I would do that after accepting a call; and I suggested you might want to double check your chronology for the years of my membership on the clergy roster. [04] This was very simple: I remain in the English District, accept the call, and the RSO then goes to whatever district wishes to have it. But, instead, you managed to remove one of your pastors two weeks after he had accepted a call and six months before his membership in synod would expire.

From August of 2016 until recently I believed that you made a series of easily avoidable mistakes, which you compounded with easily correctable errors, all of which you would remedy and that you would correct the public record. After this length of time, you have made this charitable assumption impossible. You have been asked for over a year and a half to correct the untruths which you circulated and published, and you have not. Regrettably, I now have to document, once again, that you have chosen to fabricate in order to avoid telling the truth. The truth is that I have never been restricted or suspended as a pastor in our synod. You, however, wrote on July 18, 2016 that I was restricted (by quoting bylaw 2.13.2.1(b)) and suspended (by quoting bylaw 2.13.4). These are just two public claims on your part that are outrageous. [05] Neither you nor your office (nor any of your predecessors) ever mentioned either of these prior to that date. You, as my district president at the time, would have to have known this, because there is a process for both of these categories that creates documentation, a paper trail, and a formal procedure that involves a number of people. These have not happened and do not exist because none of these things has ever occurred in my case. As my district president at the time, it would be very important for you to determine the source of these lies, correct them, and also determine how long, to what extent, and by what method they had been spread, and remedy and correct them.

It is now also necessary for you to explain why you would fabricate these false claims which you had never mentioned before to justify your action in removing me from our clergy roster on July 18, 2016. Why do that if you truly believed that your stated reason (that after inviting me to apply for an extension over the last few months you "had not heard from me") was somehow valid? Both, of course, are fabrications, but if you believed the first set of fabrications, why would you need to publish the second set?

You repeated this pattern on August 23, 2016 when you wrote to our synod's business manager that I was "removed from the roster of Ordained Ministers... in accord with Bylaw 2.11.2.3 (b) for non-compliance", and that this was a "misunderstanding" which would be corrected. [06] This introduces a third set of falsehoods. Neither you nor your office mentioned bylaw 2.11.2.3 (which involves non-candidates and annual reports) before this date. Again, why introduce yet another set of fictions if you believed that your earlier set were true? This is another fabrication, just like your fabrication of my being removed because my membership was restricted and suspended.

Your letter of August 23, 2016 attempts to correct in private an action you took in public while continuing and leaving the untruths you committed in public uncorrected. You need to correct the action you took and the fictions used to justify them in the same way they were committed: in public, and not in private. This letter attempts to evade that responsibility by fabricating yet another fiction as your reason.

You repeated this fiction yet again in March of 2017 with your corrected memo to "Rev. Matthew Harrison, President" and "All District Presidents & Administrative Assistants" which you back dated to July 20, 2016. In it you wrote that I was removed from "the Roster of Ordained Ministers of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod by action of the District President, effective July 18, 2016, in accord with Bylaw 2.11.2.3 (b) for non-compliance. Therefore, he is no longer eligible for call consideration." [07] You circulated this nine months after I had accepted a call to a Recognized Service Organization, eight months after I had been transferred from the English District to the Minnesota South District, and eight months after you had privately corrected your "misunderstanding" about my public removal in your letter of August 23, 2016. It was also after months of correspondence with you and your office detailing exactly what I have been doing and that I would soon accept a call, and years of correspondence with your office and your predecessors detailing my activities as an advisory member of synod.

Why would you not tell the truth about an action you reversed eight months prior? If your public action was indeed a "misunderstanding" which you would correct (as you described it in August of 2016), what is the point of claiming it as your excuse again eight months later? You cannot change your stated reasons after the fact.

The Large Catechism explains that observance of the Eighth Commandment is vital because failing to tell the truth by engaging in false witness is so corrosive. This corrodes our life together, our ability to live out our vocations, and even the simple and necessary act of communication. The frightening prospect here is that you may have corroded and destroyed your own credibility and ability to function as a member of our synod. This is a head spinning series of not just unproven assertions, but claims you have made that are impossible and demonstrated to be untrue. Your corrected memo of March of 2017 claims that you removed me in July of 2016 for none of the reasons you stated in the July of 2016 memos and letters, but rather for a reason that you did not mention at all until a month after the fact (in August of 2016, when you reversed my removal). Your corrected memo also claims that I am ineligible for a call eight months after I had accepted a call, and nine months after I had been transferred to the Minnesota South District. And it also entirely omits the facts you have known to be true for months prior to the distribution of your corrected memo.

I would like to begin the dispute resolution process with a factual basis, including the documentation I provided you in August of 2016, and much of which is also here on this web site (http://Blog.FriendsOfULC.org) in .pdf format. Much of it is from your own office. I expect you to do the same, and produce evidence, proof or documentation that what I have detailed above is incorrect. If you cannot do this, then it will be incumbent upon you to correct the public record following the text I have already suggested. [08]

You will have to explain your motives and rationale. But after waiting this much time for you to tell the truth about me I do have an insight you might consider. You apparently believe it is acceptable for you to sacrifice the reputation of your fellow pastors rather than admit, accept responsibility for, and correct your errors and mistakes. You also appear willing to use your position as an officer in our synod to ignore your fellow pastors when they provide you evidence that you have made a mistake. I would suggest you reconsider that approach. The problem and the concern I have is not just for myself, but also for the pastors and church workers you might have removed, might wish to remove in the future, or have otherwise damaged. If I could be removed for fabricated and fictitious reasons the public record of which has not been corrected for well over a year, how many of them were removed or otherwise adversely affect in the same way? Were they able to have their reputation and membership in our synod restored, and the public record corrected?

As a first step let's start with my request to you on August 23, 2016 and which I have repeated several times, that you completely and accurately correct the public record in the way I have already detailed for you in our previous correspondence. [09] The second step is that you discover, correct and remedy the source of the untruths and fabrications directed toward me and any other member of our synod you may have removed or otherwise negatively affected using falsehoods such as these for pretexts. If these are resolved successfully then we can try to resolve whatever else remains.

In the meantime, however, I have to insist that you stop making up reasons to justify something you should never have done in the first place. It would be very wrong for you to continue to delay, prolong or stonewall the dispute resolution process by fabricating spurious and untrue claims, as it has been wrong for you all this time to delay, prolong and stonewall the very simple process of correcting the untruths you have placed in the public record about me. Before this occurred in July of 2016, I had no problem with you or the English District; just the opposite. In fact I wrote to you and your office in June of 2016 that I would like to remain in the English District and have you change my status to active after I accepted the call in July. I also saw you at our conference in October of 2015 at the Cenacle Retreat Center in Chicago and asked you if you needed anything from me. If you did have a problem with me when you were my district president, you needed to say so at the time. I would have been happy to remain in your district and have that discussion with you, and we would have had plenty of opportunities to do that because I attend all the meetings I can.

Let's get started very soon and not waste any more time. I will continue to post the relevant documentation here on Blog.FriendsOfULC.org to save the time and expense of mail, fedex, etc.

Sincerely,

Gordon Bynum

Chaplain

The Saint Timothy Society for Lutheran Seminary Scholarship

Endnotes:

[01] I pointed out a number of errors to you, including the years of my term of membership, as early as August 23, 2016 by email. See [013] below.

[02] Your office received my application for Inactive Status beginning in January of 2009 on February 25, 2008. It consisted of three items: A cover letter from President Stechholz dated January 2008 (see [001] below); My application for Inactive Status dated February 25, 2008; (see [002] below); and my email from March 3, 2008, verifying your office had received the application by fax and mail (see [003] below).

These establish I was a candidate for all of 2008 (starting in January of 2001 and ending in January of 2009). I could not have begun a term as a Non-Candidate before January of 2009. Also notice in the emails and in the forms that I explicitly ask "when the Council of Presidents decide[s] on CRM applications. If they decide that I should not continue past 2009 January, you can tell Bishop Ritt I said, 'Put me in, coach!'".

As I wrote to your office (David Stechholz was the District President then) on several occassions and again in February of 2008, I had completed my work for the seminary of the TAALC (The American Association of Lutheran Churches) as their Academic Dean, and in 2007 I was one of the original directors organizing the Saint Timothy Society (a 501c3 organization, and now a synodical RSO for which I have been the Chaplain since July of 2016).

[03] On July 18, 2016, you claimed that I had been suspended and restricted as a pastor (See [011] and [012] below). On August 23, 2016 and again on March 24, 2017, you claimed I had been removed for being "non-compliant" (See [014] and [017] below).

[04] Note the correspondence between your office and myself from May 17 to June 24, 2016 (See [019] below), especially that from June 23rd and June 24th. Two District Presidents wrote recommendations in support of the Saint Timothy Society's application to become a Recognized Service Organization, Dan May (Indiana District) and Lane Seitz (Minnesota South). Either of those districts, or the English, would have been fine for the district of membership for the Saint Timothy Society as an RSO.

[05] See [012] and [013] below.

[06] See [014] below.

[07] See See [017] below.

[08] My letter to you dated May 17, 2018, suggests specific text and steps you could follow. See See [018] below.

[09] See [013], [016] and [017] below, as well as the other entries on this blog, https://Blog.FriendsOfULC.org

Cited and Referenced Sources:

[Numbered links] return to beginning of Endnotes section.
https links opens document in another window.


[001] 2008 January, Letter, from District President David Stechholz: https://goo.gl/77wdzn.

[002] February 25, 2008, Application for Inactive Status: https://goo.gl/Z8AKjy

[003] March 3, 2008, Email, Gordon Bynum to President's Office, English District: https://goo.gl/HM7oFR

[004] May 16, 2016, Email, English District to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/CNqjor

[005] May 16, 2016, Email, Gordon Bynum to English District: https://goo.gl/EWJXPc

[006] May 17, 2016, Email, English District to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/39fj1J

[007] June 21, 2016, Email, Gordon Bynum to English District: https://goo.gl/tfWoJs

[008] June 23, 2016, Letter, (by Fedex) Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy: https://goo.gl/dAeMpv

[009] July 5, 2016, Letter, Dorothy Krans, Director of Recognized Service Organizaions, LC-MS: https://goo.gl/UxQrJJ

[010] July 8, 2016, Call Letter, Chaplain, Saint Timothy Society to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/fSRTkr

[011] July 18, 2016, Letter, Jamison Hardy to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/YXkgXh

[012] July 18, 2016, Memo, Jamison Hardy to President Matthew Harrison, All District Presidents and Administrative Assistants: https://goo.gl/5d5k3h

[013] August 23, 2016, Email, Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy: https://goo.gl/EWy1og

[014] August 23, 2016, Letter, Jamison Hardy to Eugene Weeke: https://goo.gl/jDAX39

[015] August 24, 2016, Tranfer Form for Gordon Bynum, Jamison Hardy, English District, to Minnesota South District: https://goo.gl/1EK8bC

[016] March 17, 2017, Letter, Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy, : https://goo.gl/BA3ewb

[017] March 24, 2017, Corrected Memo, (Dated July 20, 2017) Jamison Hardy to President Matthew Harrison, All District Presidents and Administrative Assistants: https://goo.gl/brBzeD

[018] May 17, 2017, Letter, Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy: https://goo.gl/i2wNEp

[019] May 17 - June 24, 2016, Correspondence between English District and Gordon Bynum: https://bit.ly/2IGTUQ8

[020] June 27-30, 2012, English District Convention Workbook, 2-26, "Change of Status - Ordained Ministers": https://bit.ly/2sjGXpj

[021] June 27-30, 2012, English District Convention Workbook, 2-7, "Jubilarians - Ordained": https://bit.ly/2J0ObFg

[022] June 27-30, 2012, English District Convention Workbook, Final Edition: https://bit.ly/2sh587W

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

So How Is The Progress On The Retractions And Corrections?

You, Dear Readers, are the best. [a] Your help has been vital in addressing the earlier events described here and at Blog.2Realms.com, and you have made all the difference in standing up for "whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report". You have held fast to these things when both the church and the world considers these virtues to be dispensable and inconvenient, from the sale of the University Lutheran Chapel property in Minneapolis to the sale of the KFUO frequency licence in Saint Louis. Thank you!

Quite a few of you have asked how it can be that I have remained a pastor in the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod when the public notices, announcements, and memos from July of 2016 remain unretracted and uncorrected, and say otherwise. I have been asking that myself since some of you brought my removal to my attention, something of which I had been unaware since I had accepted a call as Chaplain of a new Recognized Service Organization (RSO) of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod (LCMS) the second week of July of 2016. After waiting a year and half for the retractions and corrections, I think it best to post here, on this blog, documentation of my efforts. So my removal from the pastoral roster of the LCMS did not occur (being expunged and reversed in August of 2016), but the published announcements say that it did, and have yet to be corrected.

So God Bless you for all your help. The following letter may be of some interest. [b]


Dear President Hardy,

It has been a year and a half since your effort to remove me from the synod's pastoral roster was reversed. And yet, here we are, many months from August of 2016 when you reversed the action, but not the public notices, announcements and memos saying that I have been removed from our synod's clergy roster. So my removal has been reversed, but the public notices have not been corrected and retracted. You seem to be having some difficulty completing the task you began so many months ago. Given this length of time and the number of months since the Lutheran Reporter published your announcement of my being removed, I thought it best to publish this letter, our other correspondence, and related documentation on Blog.FriendsOfULC.org. That blog is a better way for me to let others know how it came about that I have not been removed from our synod's clergy roster, yet the various public notices say otherwise, and have not been corrected. Pointing them to the correspondence and materials on the blog is much more efficient. You will also be able to read most, if not all, of the relevant documentation on the blog. I will put the links to the materials in the endnotes, which will point to the documentation in .pdf files, blog posts, and other formats which can be viewed and downloaded. And I will place future correspondence to you on that blog, where it can be easily accessed by you.

In summary, after some correspondence in May and June of 2016 I wrote to you and your office on June 21st and 23rd of 2016 (by email and fedex) that I would shortly accept a call as a Chaplain to a new Recognized Service Organization (RSO), the Saint Timothy Society. After receiving the synod's letter accepting them as an RSO on July 5th of 2016, the Saint Timothy Society formally extended the call to me on July 8th of 2016, which I accepted a few days later. [01] [02] Shortly thereafter, you removed me from membership as a pastor in the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod on July 18, [03] and then on August 23rd and 24th my removal was expunged, and you transferred my membership to the Minnesota South District as a pastoral candidate accepting a call as Chaplain to the Saint Timothy Society. [04]

For reasons which I (and others) cannot fathom, you are having difficulty with the retraction, correction, and expunging of the various public notices and memos you placed on the synod's website, in the Reporter, and published to "President Matthew Harrison, All District Presidents and Administrative Assistants" of my being removed. [05] I had always assumed that, as my District President at the time, you would be glad to know in June of 2016 that I would shortly receive, and accept, a call to a new synodical RSO in July of 2016. And, likewise, that you were delighted to correct your error when you attempted to remove me from the pastoral roster later that same July. And, again, that you would be equally delighted to retract and correct the public announcements of my removal, because, well, I had not, and have not, been removed from our synod's roster of pastors.

To paraphrase the old bidding prayer, "Let it be our care and delight to prepare ourselves to hear again the message", that, joyously, your earlier public notices are retracted and corrected. So let me do my part, once again, as I did in August of 2016 and repeatedly thereafter, to encourage you that you may have no hesitation about completing the task you began so long ago. And to dispel any confusion you might have, let me, once again, demonstrate that your error was in your effort to remove me from the clergy roster in the first place. As I and others have pointed out, your publicly stated reasons for my removal have, in addition to being proven false, differ from document to document. So let's set aside for the moment the various other defects and inadequacies and concentrate on just one or two (of the many) that caused my removal being expunged. Remarkably, you had the years wrong. The term of my pastoral membership in the synod began in 2009 and would have ended in 2017. You somehow managed to confuse 2009 for 2008 and 2017 for 2016. This was demonstrated to you with documentation a year and a half ago, but, so that we might not despair, let us do so again. Here yet again is the text of the letter I sent to you in August of 2016 from District President Stechholz, addressed to me and dated 2008 January, which states:

On January 1, 2001, you were granted membership in the Synod as a Candidate Member. Bylaw 2.11.2.2 (a) states that those individuals granted Candidate Status "may be continued on the roster for a period not to exceed four years by act of the president of the district through which the person holds membership." The purpose of this letter is to inform you that your membership in the Synod, as a Candidate Member, will come to an end on January 1, 2009...Enclosed with this letter is an application for Inactive Status form...Please return the enclose[d] Application to me no later than February 25, 2008. [06]

It would be impossible for me to have been granted "membership in the Synod" beginning in January of 2008, because I was a Candidate Member until January 1, 2009. The decision to grant or decline membership beginning in January of 2009 would have to have been made between February 25, 2008, when the application was received, and the end of 2008. But clearly it is impossible for my term of membership to be granted beginning on January 1, 2008, some two months before my application was received. The application forms [07] sent with that letter were returned to the English District in February of 2008. I followed that application with an email to the English District, and received a response that the application had been received. [08]

I was granted membership in synod as a candidate from 2001 to 2009. That was followed by my membership in the synod (as an Inactive Status candidate or non-candidate pastor) from 2009 to 2017. The "effective date" of my membership status as a non-candidate could not be in January of 2008, or any date earlier than January 2009. The "effective date" could only have started in January of 2009, following which the Council of Presidents could grant or decline my "non-candidate status" for another eight year term beginning in January of 2017, and not in 2016.

Your mistake of one calendar year would have mattered little, if at all, had you not attempted to remove me from the clergy roster some two weeks after I had accepted a call. In doing so, you made a simple and correctable error on your part (which would have resolved itself) into a series of errors, which you now need to correct.

Another notable and bizarre defect is apparent in your letter to me dated July 18, 2016, which states:
We have in our English District records that your non-candidate status expired January 31, 2016. Over the last several months, letters and emails were sent to you, inviting you to write a letter to the Council of Presidents requesting an extension. Since the English District did not hear back from you, on July 18, 2016, Bishop Jamison J. Hardy made the decision to remove you from the LCMS roster in accord with Bylaw 2:13.2.1 (b) and 2.13.4 for non-compliance. [09] [10]


As you have known for over a year and a half, none of this is correct. I contacted you and your office numerous times in writing between May and July of 2016, copies of which you can find in the footnote links below. You knew in June I would be accepting a call in the next few weeks. Neither bylaw cited would apply, and neither would "non-compliance".

Not only is the letter incorrect, at least two of the stated reasons are bizarre fabrications. Your letter has cited by-law 2.13.2.1(b), which refers to something called "restricted status". But I have never been on restricted status, or anything of the kind. I have been suggested for call lists, I had been in the English District for about 25 years, and no one has ever suggested to me that I am "incapable of performing the duties of the office or position because of physical, mental, or emotional disability". How would it be possible for you to get that wrong when the bylaw itself requires someone to be "notified in writing as to the specific reasons for having been placed on restricted status" and that notice be given "in writing the President of the Synod and all other district presidents of such restricted status"?

Your letter also cites bylaw 2.13.4, which is even more outrageous. Bylaw 2.13.14 refers to something called suspended status, and the process of expulsion from the synod. Not only have I never been on restricted status, but, likewise, I have never been placed on suspended status, or anything of the kind. And, again, it seems impossible for you commit this as an inadvertent error, because like bylaw 2.13.2.1, it requires written notice, and also a formal process.

So I am perplexed as to why you would not hurry with delight to retract and correct your memos and notices which contain things about me which you have known for quite some time are not true, and which appear to be fabricated to justify an action which never should have occurred, and which you have already reversed and expunged. [11]

And, of course, this is in addition to all the other reasons you already have to finish the corrections you began in August of 2016, and more reasons why the mistake in July of 2016 should not have happened at all. So let this knowledge encourage you and speed you along in finishing the corrections you began in August of 2016 when you reversed the mistake of the previous July. [12] Now you can rest assured that you no longer need to try to defend or excuse something that never should have happened in the first place by fabricating specious reasons such as "non-compliance" and bylaws which concern things that have never occurred in my case. [13] That burden is lifted, because, in addition to all the other easily avoidable and correctable errors, inaccuracies, and fabrications, you had the wrong years for my roster membership. Fix the dates at your next convention, fix the errors in the announcements and memos, and these correctable errors will be reversed in the same venues in which they were originally made. I have already described how this can be done, and the wording, in my letter to you in May of 2017. I will post them on this blog as well.

Sincerely,

Gordon Bynum

Chaplain

The Saint Timothy Society for Lutheran Seminary Scholarship

Endnotes:

[a] You, Dear Reader, might object that this is an over generalization, too kind and too generous. Well, perhaps, but I say take whatever compliments you can get.

For those who are not members of, or less familiar with, the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, the following letter probably uses terminology that is unfamiliar. "Clergy Roster", "Member of Synod", "Candidate", refer to ordained clergy who hold membership in the "synod" (or LCMS, or Missouri Synod). "Non-Candidate Members" of the LCMS no longer exist; that category was eliminated after 15 years (or so) in 2016. If you find that confusing, you are not alone.

[b] Some of you have suggested that since the notices were published in the Reporter, an official publication of the church, and to the Council of Presidents, that they should take it upon themselves to retract and correct them, since they can easily determine the notices are incorrect. I agree with you completely. However, I am told that only the district president who published the notices can retract and correct them. Some of you have also pointed out that rule sounds like a tremendous liability for any corporation (religious or otherwise). Again, I do not disagree.

[01] That upcoming call was the subject of my email to your office sent June 21, 2016, and a letter sent to you by Fedex on June 23, 2016. See [008] below. See [010] for the call letter.

[02] See [009] below for the July 5, 2016 acceptance letter from the office of Recognized Service Organizations (RSO) of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod.

Perhaps there was some confusion with the Saint Timothy Society being a new RSO. In our first phone conversation in August of 2016, you mentioned that your office had contacted the offices of the Missouri Synod and searched for the Saint Timothy Society, but you found no trace of the new RSO. Did you contact the synod's Recognized Service Organizations office or the Secretary of Synod? Both of them were happy to confirm that the Saint Timothy Society was indeed a new RSO.

[03] See See [011] below for your letter removing me from the clergy roster. See [012] for your memo to the synodical president, "All District Presidents and Administrative Assistants", on page 2.

[04] See [014] for your letter of August 23, 2016. See [015] below for your transfer form dated August 24, 2016.

[05] My requests for this began in July of 2016 by email and were followed by letter, on March 17, 2017 (see [016] below) and again on May 17, 2017 (see [018] below). The .pdf file at citation [018] is a corrected version; I made a mistake in the year of the announcement I am requesting you place in your next convention workbook.

[06] I have added the bold italics for emphasis. President Stechholz's letter dated 2008 January is below at [001]. The application due February 25, 2008 was for the term January 2009 to January 2013, and was extended another four years, from January 2014 to January 2017. Those dates mirror exactly the previous term as a Candidate member of synod from January of 2001 to January of 2009.

[07] At least two forms (and possibly more; these are the two I have found so far), including the application at [002] below.

Sometime between February of 2008 and June of 2012 my status as a Non-Candidate was backdated as effective from January of 2008. The synod's secretary and office of rosters and statistics still listed me as a candidate from January of 2009 as late as June of 2012. The synod's chronology in June of 2012 showed an eight year term from 2001 ending in January of 2009, and the second eight year term beginning in January of 2009 which would end in January of 2017 (if approved, of course: each eight year term consist of two four year periods, the first depending on the approval of the Council of Presidents and the second on the district president). In June of 2012, during the English District Convention in Saint Louis, I met with the secretary of synod when I noticed the errors in the district convention workbook. Their advice at the time was that the mistake would be inconsequential, and Candidates, Non-Candidates, and Emeritus members of synod all can accept Calls. You made this error consequential in July of 2016, and I have asked you to fix this a number of times. In my letter to you on May 17, 2017 (see [018] below) I asked you "to place the following in the relevant section of the 2018 English District Convention Workbook and also correct the record with synod's office of rosters and statistics:
“The Rev. Gordon Bynum's status change from Candidate to Non-Candidate occurred on January 1, 2009, and not in 2008. We regret the error.”
See [020] below for the error in the 2012 English District Convention Workbook. This error predated your term as District President and would have been of less (or no) significance after accepting a call in July of 2016. But you apparently insist on making these mistakes of great significance by failing to correct the public record. This is a strange path you have chosen; the one I have been suggesting has the advantage of being much simpler, in addition to being true.

[08] The reference to 2009 January is explicit in President Stechholz's letter, and also mentioned in the email thread from March of 2008 (see [003] below). My email from March 3, 2008 asks:
I don't think there's any hurry at the moment, but it would good to know when the Council of Presidents decide on CRM applications. If they decide that I should not continue past 2009 January, you can tell Bishop Ritt I said, "Put me in, coach!" He can suggest some things for me, and I could finish up what I'm doing for grants, endowments, finance, etc., before taking a call.
At the time I received the application form for inactive status, I had 11 months remaining as a Candidate, my name was on call lists, and would appear on call lists for several years following. Non-Candidate members of synod, like candidate and emeritus members, can and do accept calls. Reading the instructions on the application form itself, I was then (as before, after, and now) "able and willing to consider a Call". The four other criteria for a candidate on the form (health, fitness, involvement, willingness) were never obstacles for me. I had served on a floor committee for a synodical convention, regularly attended pastoral conferences and district conventions, been the Academic Dean for the seminary of the American Association of Lutheran Churches, and was one of the original directors and organizers of the Saint Timothy Society, the synodical RSO for which I have been the Chaplain since July of 2016. I also taught and worked in academic administration with grants, endowments, and investments, among other things.

[09] Quoted from your letter sent to me dated July 18, 2016. See [011] below. One problem (among many) with your letter is that you knew as early as June 21, 2016 that a call to me would be forthcoming (see [007] below). Two days later, on June 23, 2016, you knew I would be accepting the call (see [008] below). I received the call on July 8, 2016.

[10] It's unfortunate that your delay in finishing the corrections has made this an issue. Had you not tried to remove me, I doubt it would matter. Had you finished correcting the public record when you corrected the action of the removal, I don't think an explanation would be necessary. But you made your easily avoidable and easily correctable error an issue by your delay of more than a year in correcting your mistake. How many of your pastors and church workers have you removed a year early, or otherwise adversely affected, because of an error in the date and year on the part of the English District? You were removing, on average, one to two members of synod in your district a month. How many of them were removed too early, based on the district having mistaken the dates of their membership in synod? Note the text of the email exchange between myself and your office from May 17 to June 24 of 2016 (see [019] below). Your email to me on May 18, 2016 would make sense if my membership ended in 2017, not 2016 as stated in your email, and if the erroneous years of 2008 to 2016 for my roster membership are corrected to 2009 to 2017.

As late as October of 2015 you saw me in person at our conference at the Cenacle Retreat Center in Chicago and mentioned nothing remotely related to what you and your office would write and publish the following May, June and July.

The timing and content of the email struck me as odd, and I wanted to make sure I had not missed an earlier letter, so I asked about it in my reply email on that same day, May 16, 2016 (see [005] below). The reply I received on May 17, 2016 makes sense for an application for a term beginning in 2017, not 2016 (see [006] below).

[11] I pointed out the error in the years of my term of membership to you as early as August 23, 2016 by email. See [013] below.

[12] You can add all of the above to the other reasons to finish the corrections. But let's make this as simple as possible: I was a member of synod from January of 2009 until January of 2017. I have never been suspended or restricted. Had my application for emeritus membership or non-candidate membership been declined, I would still have been a member of synod until January of 2017, barring removal for cause or resignation. The following things also occurred, but if they had not I would still have been a member of synod until January of 2017: I accepted a call as Chaplain to a synodical RSO the second week of July, 2016; the synod in convention eliminated the membership category of "non-candidate" on July 13, 2016, and made all "non-candidates" "candidates"; "candidate" inactive members of synod on July 13, 2016 would remain so until July 13, 2026, again, barring removal for cause or resignation. Emeritus, non-candidate, and candidate members of synod can, and do, accept calls. If you had any reason to believe I should not have accepted a call, you needed to let me know that before July of 2016. You did not, and neither have any of your predecessors.

This is not complicated. You removed me some five months before my term as a member of synod would end, and a week after I had accepted a call to a Recognized Service Organization of the synod. You fabricated demonstrably false reasons for your action. Finish fixing what you have done and correct the public record.

[13] It is apparent from the documents here in this blog post that I routinely fill out the forms, reports, and applications from the districts, synod and the Council of Presidents. In February of 2008 I completed an application some ten months before my term as a candidate member of synod would end in January of 2009 (see [002] below). I offered to send you the application for inactive status six months before my current term ended in my email to your office on June 21, 2016 (see page 5 of [019] below).

I would have been applying for emeritus or non-candidate membership in synod in June of 2016 knowing that I would be accepting a called position in the next 3 weeks, and with six months remaining as a member of synod. I had, and have, no objection to that. But what was your objection to the much simpler and direct method outlined in my email of June 23, 2016 (see page 7 of [019] below)? After checking with the Secretary of Synod, it became apparent that it would be easiest (and quickest) if I stayed in the English District and accepted the call, which would change my status to active pastoral member of synod.


Cited and Referenced Sources:

[Numbered links] return to beginning of Endnotes section.
https links opens document in another window.


[001] 2008 January, Letter, from District President David Stechholz: https://goo.gl/77wdzn.

[002] February 25, 2008, Application for Inactive Status: https://goo.gl/Z8AKjy

[003] March 3, 2008, Email, Gordon Bynum to President's Office, English District: https://goo.gl/HM7oFR

[004] May 16, 2016, Email, English District to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/CNqjor

[005] May 16, 2016, Email, Gordon Bynum to English District: https://goo.gl/EWJXPc

[006] May 17, 2016, Email, English District to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/39fj1J

[007] June 21, 2016, Email, Gordon Bynum to English District: https://goo.gl/tfWoJs

[008] June 23, 2016, Letter, (by Fedex) Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy: https://goo.gl/dAeMpv

[009] July 5, 2016, Letter, Dorothy Krans, Director of Recognized Service Organizaions, LC-MS: https://goo.gl/UxQrJJ

[010] July 8, 2016, Call Letter, Chaplain, Saint Timothy Society to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/fSRTkr

[011] July 18, 2016, Letter, Jamison Hardy to Gordon Bynum: https://goo.gl/YXkgXh

[012] July 18, 2016, Memo, Jamison Hardy to President Matthew Harrison, All District Presidents and Administrative Assistants: https://goo.gl/5d5k3h

[013] August 23, 2016, Email, Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy: https://goo.gl/EWy1og

[014] August 23, 2016, Letter, Jamison Hardy to Eugene Weeke: https://goo.gl/jDAX39

[015] August 24, 2016, Tranfer Form for Gordon Bynum, Jamison Hardy, English District, to Minnesota South District: https://goo.gl/1EK8bC

[016] March 17, 2017, Letter, Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy, : https://goo.gl/BA3ewb

[017] March 24, 2017, Corrected Memo, (Dated July 20, 2017) Jamison Hardy to President Matthew Harrison, All District Presidents and Administrative Assistants: https://goo.gl/brBzeD

[018] May 17, 2017, Letter, Gordon Bynum to Jamison Hardy: https://goo.gl/i2wNEp

[019] May 17 - June 24, 2016, Correspondence between English District and Gordon Bynum: https://bit.ly/2IGTUQ8

[020] June 27-30, 2012, English District Convention Workbook, 2-26, "Change of Status - Ordained Ministers": https://bit.ly/2sjGXpj

[021] June 27-30, 2012, English District Convention Workbook, 2-7, "Jubilarians - Ordained": https://bit.ly/2J0ObFg

[022] June 27-30, 2012, English District Convention Workbook, Final Edition: https://bit.ly/2sh587W

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Telling The Truth Would Be Much Easier; Fabricating Excuses Must Be Exhausting

Well, Dear Readers, as some of you have mentioned, it is a curious spectacle to see someone go to so much effort to avoid telling the truth in order to avoid correcting their mistakes. In this case, given the length of time the fabrications have gone unretracted, I'm not sure how it differs from outright lying. So perhaps the most charitable assumption might be that avoidable mistakes became correctable errors, and then the correctable errors were justified by fabrications. And now, as of this writing (a year and a half later in February of 2018), it is becoming difficult to believe that the first mistake was not a malicious lie from the beginning.

But let's hope this is not the case, and let's redouble our efforts in getting the truth out and correcting the record. Below is the letter (one of several) sent by my former district president in May of 2017 after he fabricated yet another excuse for his effort to remove my name from the clergy roster in July of 2016. Like the earlier excuses, this one was also demonstrably false, made up eight months after the fact, and had the added curiosity of having never been mentioned before. [d3]

The Reverend Dr. Jamison J. Hardy, Bishop and President
The English District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod
33100 Freedom Road
Farmington, Michigan 48336-4030


2017 May 17


Dear President Hardy, I think we need more clarity. Let's also start with greater simplicity. Again, I would like the record to reflect the reality, so I am asking you to send the following memo:

DATE: TO: ________________ Rev. Matthew Harrison, President
All District Presidents & Administrative Assistants
FROM:
Rev. Dr. Jamison J. Hardy, President, English District, LCMS
SUBJECT: Gordon Bynum – Ordained Minister

Please disregard the previous memos and announcements regarding the roster status of Rev. Gordon Bynum. At no time was he removed from the ordained roster of the synod. The memos, announcements and any other actions indicating otherwise are retracted, along with any references or suggestions made in them by citing synodical bylaws 2.13.2.1, 2.13.4, 2.11.2.3 (b) and “non-compliance”. Rev. Bynum accepted a call to a synodical RSO, the Saint Timothy Society, in July of 2016, and was transferred to the Minnesota South District in August of 2016. He was and remains eligible for consideration for a call. We regret having caused any misunderstanding or damage to his reputation this may have occasioned.


I ask that the following appear in the print edition of the Lutheran Reporter under the “Official Notices” section:

GORDON BYNUM was and remains eligible to receive a call. At no time was he removed from the ordained roster of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. The earlier notices and announcements of his removal (in July and August of 2016) are, regrettably, in error.


I ask that the same appear in the online version of the official notices (https://blogs.lcms.org/category/lcms-notices).

I also ask that the notice found at https://blogs.lcms.org/2016/updates-from-lcms-districts-august-2016 be appended with the note “(THIS NOTICE IS IN ERROR AND HAS BEEN RETRACTED).”

I ask you to place the following in the relevant section of the 2018 English District Convention Workbook:



“The Rev. Gordon Bynum's status change from Candidate to Non-Candidate occurred on January 1, 2009, and not in 2008. We regret the error.”


When I mentioned the error in June of 2012, I was informed it was a trivial mistake, probably due to an administrative oversight, and it would not have any signifigance. It became signifigant when the erroroneous date became part of the attempt to remove me from the clergy roster. This needs to be corrected.

I ask that you include the following in the 2018 Engish District Convention Workbook under the category “TRANSFERS OUT - ORDAINED MINISTERS”:

The Rev. Gordon Bynum August 24, 2016 Minnesota South District
Chaplain, Saint Timothy Society, Recognized Service Organization

Please refer to the correspondence and documentation I have sent since August of 2016 if you need further verification. I would appreciate your immediate attention to this matter given the length of time the memos and notices have gone uncorrected, and the ongoing confusion this has generated.

Sincerely,

Gordon Bynum



CC:
Rev. Dr. Dean Nadasdy, District President, The Minnesota South District LC – MS
Matthew Johnson, Circuit Counsellor, Northwest Metro, Minnesota South District
Directors, the Saint Timothy Society
Rev. Dr. John Sias, Synod Executive Secretary, LC - MS
Eugene Weeke, Director of Business Services, LC - MS

Footnotes:


[d3] A .pdf version of this letter and attachments are at this url: https://goo.gl/XadGQB

Saturday, March 18, 2017

You Appear To Be Struggling; Perhaps You Should Start With The Facts

Some of you [c9] have expressed varying degrees of incredulity and amazement that I am still waiting for the retractions and corrections of the notices of my removal as a pastor from the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod (or "LCMS"). [d0] I too have expressed the same, given that I was not removed, and continue to this day as a pastor in the LCMS, [e1] and have been serving in my current position as the Chaplain of the Saint Timothy Society since July of 2016.

Below is just one of my many efforts to have the record corrected. This particular letter was sent in March of 2017, [f2] some seven months after my removal had been expunged in August of 2016. As always, I am very grateful to all of you who have brought to my attention the demonstrably false information about me, the Saint Timothy Society, and the excellent people and churches who have helped and supported us over the years. As Mark Twain put it, A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. This particular set of lies has been left unretracted (as of this writing now in February of 2018) for a year and half, so it has quite the head start. Proverbs 12:19 has the antidote to Twain's insightful diagnosis of the human condition.


The Reverend Dr. Jamison J. Hardy, Bishop and President
The English District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod
33100 Freedom Road
Farmington, Michigan 48336-4030


2017 March 18


Dear President Hardy, It has been over six months since we began the process of corrections to my roster status. I believe the following corrections can be relatively simple. My roster membership chronology is straightforward:

2001 Jan. 1 to 2009 Jan. 1: member of synod as a Candidate (8 years).
2009 Jan. 1 to 2017 Jan. 1: member of synod as either a Candidate or Non-Candidate (8 years).
2016 July 8: received call as Chaplain for the Saint Timothy Society (a new synodical RSO).
2016 July 13: member of synod as a Candidate (term of 10 years).
2016 Aug. 24: transferred from the English District to the Minnesota South District.

I would like to have the record reflect the reality. The following are some of the remaining items I am asking you to address.

1. Would you correct and retract your memo of July 18, 2016 to “Rev. Matthew Harrison, President” and “All District Presidents and Administrative Assistants” in the same manner, using the same venue, and to the same recipients? This correction would include: (a) I have not been removed from the Roster of Ordained Ministers of The Lutheran Church -- Missouri Synod; (b) I was and continue to be eligible for a call; and (c) that the memo of July 18th is in error and retracted. It would also be important to include: (a) the use of bylaws 2.13.2.1 and 2.13.4 in the July 18 memo is mistaken; (b) I have never been “placed on restricted status” for being “incapable of performing the duties of the office or position because of physical, mental, or emotional disability”; nor (c) have “formal proceedings have been commenced” (against me) “which may lead to expulsion from the Synod” recently or any other time. These are quotes from bylaws 2.13.2.1 and 2.13.4.

My assumption is that the use of these bylaws (along with “non-compliance”) in your memo of July18th is a mistake. In your letter to Mr. Weeke dated August 23rd you do not mention these but bylaw 2.11.2.3 instead. Your stated reason for your July 18 effort to remove me was that I had not applied for continuation as a Non-Candidate. But as mistakes go, this one is very damaging, so a more fullsome and accurate correction would be appreciated.

2. Would you clarify the sentence “Please bestow Gordon Bynum his candidate status to the Roster of Ordained Ministers of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod effective August 23, 2016” from your letter dated August 23, 2016 to Mr. Eugene Weeke? Perhaps Mr. Weeke can do this, but it is more likely that he can record and note that only one change occurred in my roster category in July (to Candidate on July 13th), and that I have not been removed as an ordained member of the LC – MS. There is no “gap” period when I was not an ordained member of synod between July 13, 2016 and August 23, 2016. On July 13, 2016 the synod in convention changed my roster status to Candidate for a period of 10 years, deleted the category of Non-Candidate, and deleted bylaw 2.11.2.3 which created and governed Non-Candidate status. That action prevails, prevents and replaces the later action of July 18th because the action of July 18th applied to a roster category (Non-Candidate) which no longer existed on the basis of bylaws which also no longer existed (2.11.2.3). I was and continue as a member of synod, and I was an ordained member of the LC – MS as a Candidate during that period.

3. Will you correct and retract the official public notices in the Lutheran Reporter of 2016 August and on the synod's website using the same venue and in the same manner, both in print and digital formats? This would include that I was and continue to be on the ordained roster of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod; I have been and continue to be eligible for a call; and that the 2016 August official notices in the print edition of the Lutheran Reporter and the electronic version of the synod's website stating otherwise are in error and retracted.

4. Will you correct the record regarding the dates of my membership roster categories and inform the relevant districts (including Minnesota South and English) and departments of synod using the chronology in the first paragraph above? I am sympathetic to the fact that you were probably not the District President when these dates became confused, but it would be very helpful to have this corrected. Whatever my clergy roster categories were (Candidate or Non-Candidate), one of their terms had to be from 2001 to 2009 followed by another from 2009 to 2017. The enclosed letter from the English District dated January 2008 verifies that I was a Candidate from 2001 to 2009.

If any confusion remains that my following term on the clergy roster (as either Non-Candidate or Candidate) began in 2009, let me know and I will dig deeper into storage and send you more documentation. Given what I have sent you already since May of 2016, it may be overkill. I'm happy to send it all again, and I can try to locate and send to you other documentation you might find helpful. Please let me know what you decide; if you determine you are able to do the items above, I would appreciate copies for my records.

Sincerely,

Gordon Bynum

CC:

Rev. Dr. Dean Nadasdy, District President, The Minnesota South District LC – MS
Matthew Johnson, Circuit Counsellor, Northwest Metro, Minnesota South District
Directors, the Saint Timothy Society
Rev. Dr. John Sias, Synod Executive Secretary, LC - MS
Eugene Weeke, Director of Business Services, LC - MS

Enclosures: 3

January 2008 Letter, David Stechholz to Gordon Bynum July 18, 2016 Memo, Jamison Hardy to Praesidium and all Administrative Assistants 2016 August Official Notices

Footnotes:


[c9] "Some" here also includes a surprising number of clergy and members of the LCMS, friends and visitors to this humble web site, "Well-Wishers", and the the other usual suspects from University Luther Chapel, The Saint Timothy Society, and 2Realms.com.


[d0] Unfortunately, abbreviations and acronyms abound. This one is hopefully clear enough.


[e1] I accepted the call as Chaplain in the second week of July, a few days after receiving it. As of 2018 February my former district president has still not corrected the announcements and memos.


[f2] A .pdf version of that letter and attachments are at this url: https://goo.gl/35irHw https://goo.gl/35irHw

Thursday, July 14, 2016

The Saint Timothy Society is Now a Recognised Service Organisation (RSO) of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod

Sometime back in 2007 the Evanglical Lutheran Church of Kenya (ELCK) invited Rev. Tom Aadland to teach at their seminary in Matongo, Kenya following his last term as Presiding Pastor of the American Association of Lutheran Churches.  At the end of that year the Saint Timothy Society for Lutheran Seminary Scholarship was chartered and incorporated to support that work and become a 501c3 organisation in 2008 (for our readers outside the United States, that's one of those pesky codes for non-profits and charities that allow donors to deduct their contributions when paying their income tax; for our readers inside the United States, you have our empathy for having to deal with the current tax code).  We've chugged along for the past nine years doing a lot more than we thought we could largely due to Tom Aadland's excellent success in raising money.  This is often the way of Churches and Church societies; we fail to understand that we can't do what we intend to do, and due to that lack of understanding we manage to do those things anyway.

At some point the Saint Timothy Society decided to apply for what is known as "RSO status", that is, to become a Recognised Service Organisation (RSO) within the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod (LC-MS).  This came to completion in July of 2016: RSO recognition was given by the LC-MS, the signatures on the agreement were completed by the beginning of August of 2016, and the Saint Timothy Society now appears on the LCMS.org website (and in the RSO directory).

Your humble writer (blogger? that's a word now, eh?) has gained even greater humility (and proud of it!) by being called as the Chaplain for the Saint Timothy Society, which I accepted on July 14, 2016.  So the sporadic postings here will become somewhat less sporadic and will include more information about the Saint Timothy Society, in addition to University Lutheran Chapel in Minneapolis.  And in the next week I hope to have comments and contact info working on this blog.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

The Saint Timothy Society Has Been Accepted as a Recogized Service Organization (RSO) of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod (LCMS)

On July 5th the Saint Timothy Society was offered Recognized Service Organization Status by the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod. Details to follow.

For those who are fond of acronyms, that means the Saint Timothy Society has been accepted as an RSO (Recognized Service Organization) of the LCMS (The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod). For the rest of us, it means that the Saint Tim Society will continue its efforts to help support Lutheran Seminary scholarship and education overseas, most notably as part of the work Tom Aadland does at the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Kenya's seminary in Matongo, Kenya. As of this date, we're still waiting to hear in which District of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod the Saint Timothy Society will reside. This writer is a member of the clergy roster of the LCMS as a member of the English District, and we're waiting to hear back from them if they would like to be the home of the Saint Timothy Society.


Saturday, July 20, 2013

Convention Materials on Google Docs; Readable in Browser or Download

We here at Friends of University Lutheran Chapel Minneapolis have devoted much of this blog to making available to the public the documentation related to University Lutheran Chapel and the chapel's effort to bring the sale of the campus ministry property to a vote by the Minnesota South District Convention.  Along the way, we discovered that Google Drive (formerly Docs) and Google Picassa Web can be very useful in displaying documents either "in-line" or in a new browser window.

So why not do the same for the 2013 Convention Materials for the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod meeting this week in Saint Louis?  The "LCMS" (as it is abbreviated) already does an excellent job in making available its convention materials on its own website at http://www.lcms.org/convention/downloads and at http://www.lcms.org/convention.  Why not make some of these available as readable in the browser? The documents are already publicly available, so unless we're asked to remove them, we'll put the links in this post.

As usual, there are many, many caveats, disclaimers, and various other dire warnings, consequences and cautionary tales that go with the the use of the blog and whatever you find here.  See our Acceptable Use Notice (the link is displayed on the right) and read the "fine print" at the bottom of this post.

This may take a long time to load, depending on your bandwidth, connection speed, and the overall load on google apps servers, but feel free to try to view the
If that doesn't work, you can try to


The First Issue of Today's Business is a smaller file, and you might have more luck viewing
Or you can try to


And now the "fine print". The versions of these documents here may be incorrect, inaccurate, out of date and suffer from various other defects. Refer to the official website of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod (URL's given above) or to the convention officers for complete and accurate versions and other documentation. The server host provider(s) for this blog also have limitations and restrictions, including limited bandwidth and availability depending on your location and connection speed.

Which means that at some point the downloads and views may (and probably will) exceed the quota for this account on Google Apps for Business, and the links will no longer work, the page may not load, etc. Until then, we hope this is of some use.